Apex Trader Funding vs MyFundedFutures: Which Futures Prop Firm Wins in 2026?
Our closest matchup — the discount veteran vs the best-rated newcomer.
Apex Trader Funding vs MyFundedFutures is one of the tightest comparisons on our board — two of the highest-scoring 1-step futures firms, separated by a hair. Apex is the 2021 discount veteran with a 100%→90% split; MyFundedFutures (MFF) is the fast-rising 2023 firm with a near-perfect 4.9 Trustpilot and a beginner-friendly EOD drawdown.
Both run one-step evaluations on futures and micros with broker-rate commissions around $4 per round-turn. The decision usually comes down to one thing: how forgiving you need the drawdown to be. Here's the breakdown.
| Metric | Apex Trader Funding | MyFundedFutures |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 8.7/10 | 8.6/10 |
| Trustpilot | 4.5 | 4.9 |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| Evaluation | 1-Step | 1-Step (Pro / Rapid / Flex / Builder) |
| Drawdown | trailing | eod (Pro) / intraday (Flex) |
| Profit split | 100% first $25K then 90% | Up to 90% |
| Consistency rule | No single day > 30% of total profit | 50% during challenge; none on funded |
| First payout | 8 trading days | — |
| Max allocation | $1.5M | $150K |
| Round-turn commission | ~$4.60 per round-turn per contract (E-minis via Rithmic) | Broker-rate commissions (Tradovate/NinjaTrader) |
| Platforms | 6 supported | 7 supported |
Apex vs MyFundedFutures: evaluation model
Apex offers a single 1-step model plus the ability to run up to 20 accounts. MFF gives you plan variety — Pro (EOD drawdown), Flex (intraday), Rapid and Builder — so you can match the account to your style. Apex is about volume and low cost; MFF is about picking the right rule set for you.
Drawdown & risk rules
This is the deciding factor. Apex uses a strict trailing threshold drawdown that follows your peak balance up, plus a 30% consistency rule at all times. MFF's Pro plan uses an end-of-day drawdown that doesn't shrink intraday, and it drops the consistency rule entirely once you're funded (50% applies during the challenge only). For beginners, MFF Pro is materially more forgiving.
Pricing & commissions
Apex is generally cheaper to enter thanks to its deeper, more frequent coupons; MFF is competitive but relies less on huge discounts. Commissions are broadly similar (~$4 broker-rate round-turns). If minimum entry cost is your priority, Apex edges it.
Profit split & payouts
Apex's ceiling is higher — 100% of your first $25K then 90%, versus up to 90% at MFF. Both pay reliably; Apex just returns more on that first tranche of profit.
Trust & platforms
MFF carries a standout 4.9 Trustpilot (vs Apex's 4.5) and adds order-flow tools like ATAS, Volumetrica and DeepDom. Apex supports six platforms and has four years of payout history behind it. Both are well-regarded; MFF leads on raw sentiment, Apex on longevity.
Who should choose which?
- You want the lowest entry cost and the deepest coupons
- You want the higher split ceiling (100%→90%)
- You want to scale to $1.5M across up to 20 accounts
- You want a forgiving end-of-day drawdown (Pro plan)
- You want no consistency rule once funded
- You want a top-rated firm (4.9 Trustpilot) with plan flexibility
Want the full breakdown? Read our Apex Trader Funding review and MyFundedFutures review, or grab the latest Apex Trader Funding coupon codes.
Verdict — Apex Trader Funding wins overall
This is the closest call on our board. Apex wins by a hair on price, split ceiling and scale (score 8.7 vs 8.6). But MyFundedFutures is the better beginner pick — its EOD drawdown and no-funded-consistency rule make the path to a payout gentler. Choose Apex to minimise cost and maximise split; choose MFF for a more forgiving ride.
FAQ
Which is better rated, Apex or MyFundedFutures?
Which has the easier drawdown?
Which is cheaper?
Which is better for beginners?
Related comparisons
Compare Apex Trader Funding and MyFundedFutures against other top futures prop firms: